View original post on the Brand New blog

Packard Bell's new identity



Just me. At my best? Maybe... but not with a 'pure red design-driven' Packard Bell.

Packard Bell's new identity is looking to look, not to see. Where is the value? Why would any brand want to own PB? Including and especially Packard Bell. PB doesn't bear Packard Bell. Packard Bell bears Packard Bell. There doesn't appear to be any inherent value in owning PB. PB as a symbol is as superficial and redundant as the gloss effect throughout the new branding.

How is red, 'colour at its best'?! Purple is just as good at being a colour as Red is at being a colour. This sort of hyped-up rhetoric doesn't smooth over the gaping conceptual holes in this inane cosmetic make-over.

There is an attempt at a proprietary branded lifestyle but this is style without much novelty and provides no clue as to why PB might be valuable. Just about every aspirational cliche has been attempted and the sense that Packard Bell represents style without substance is tough to shake.

The new Packard Bell brand identity needs a reboot with the ideas key held down.

View original post on the Brand New blog

Top

 

 

 


 













































































Approve
Disapprove
Ambivalent

ANDREW SABATIER

About
Portfolio
Opinion
Values
Ambition
In the media
Recruitment
Contact
News



All topics

2010
2009
2008
2007

By subject


Identity
Branding
Design
Consulting
Brand marks
Crowdsourcing

By blog

Brand New
Brand Strategy Insider
David Airey
Design Observer
Ideas on Ideas
Identity Forum
Landor Associates
Logo Design Love
Other